Choose a topic


.. Society
We Live in the Present

...HUM
10 Views of Landscape
Affect and Effect
Culture is Ordinary
Dataism
I pay rent.
Listening to Corn
The Reform vs Revolution Paradox
What is Public Schooling For?

Art
AI and Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Is this picture real?
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
Weave
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Cognition
Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
Genius
GIGO
I Lost My Knife
Illusion
Incomplete Information and Stories
Instinct
Is free will an illusion?
Metarepresentations
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Pencil and Paper
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Superstition
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?

Economics
A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Markets
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Environmentalism
Blowing Up Pipelines

Epistemology
Absolute Knowledge
Equivalence
Exists
I do not know everything
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
The Past and the Future.
Uncertainty and Unpredictability
Unpredictability
Verificationism

Evolution
Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Networks
Omicron
Politics and Evolution
Roles
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Freedom
Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Laws
Libertarian Coercion

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

Mathematics
As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Memetics
Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Morality
Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?

pending
Police

Philosophy
Agency
Being
Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Ratchets
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

Politics
If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority

Programming
Loopsidaisy

Science
Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Fields
Neurophilosophy
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Time
Too Small to See
UFOs
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

Society
A society needs a government.
Belly of the Beast
Civilization
Corruption
Cultural Appropriation
Family Values
Governance
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
Magic
Open Society and Falsification
Privacy
Rules in a Knife Fight?
Sex and Gender
Society and The State
Spheres of Influence
The Care and Feeding of Free Speech
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Homeless
The Problem with Hedonism
To the Moon
Totalitarianism
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

UBI
Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs







Fields

Unknowable

Hume couldn't find causality in reality it has no weight or extension or color properties of things we see in reality.
So he concluded that what we take to be cause and effect is basically a habit we have of associating certain events with earlier events.
If the association is seen often enough then we take it to be a causal association the earlier thing caused the later thing.

But the Hume could only describe that as a habit a human construction not an aspect of reality.

Now I'll be straight up I don't think that Hume denied causality he recognized cause and effect it's just that he couldn't fit it into a scheme where things in reality have properties like weight and color.

Fast forward a few centuries to our time to see what became of his line of inquiry. For a long time it looked like Hume was right the devil was in the details. when we look closely just why one event causes another it's very hard to say.
For instance what causes a rockslide on a mountain?
We know that one rock fell loose for some reason and collided with two rocks which fell loose and collided with two more rocks each etc.
But why did that first rock cause the avalanche?

Rocks fall all the time without causing avalanches. And I think that Hume was right the answer to that question is not to be found at the level of rocks; of things with weight, color, etc.

In contemporary thinking it's found at the level of fields. We've got familiar fields like the electromagnetic field or the gravity field. Physics is full of fields. And the idea of fields is starting to influence neuroscience.

Fields address Hume's problem in a way he might have found magical it seems that everything is connected.

What is a field?
At one level of abstraction a field has a number that is associated with each point in a space what that number is depends on some sort of mathematical function.

For instance; with a magnet the equations of electromagnetism define what the electromagnetic force is at any point in the space around it. You've seen that if you've ever played with a magnet and iron filings the filings line up in accord with what that field permits. If you move the magnet of course all the filings move too. Heh that "of course" was the problem that Hume was pointing to.

But now we have the idea of a field that makes that "of course" obvious; something Hume knew nothing about.
With a field we have the idea that everything in a space is interinfuential everything influences everything else.

If one part of the system changes the rest of the system HAS to change as well because the state of everything depends on the same underlying function.

How would we think of a skree slope in terms of a field? A skree slope is a slope of loose rocks lying one atop another. Where the rocks touch each other they apply pressure to each other so the slope is a field of pressures at points. When the pressures on any rock balance then that rock just has to stay where it is.

But say a rock is displaced then the field of pressure points changes some of the pressures rise and others diminish, and IF the pressures on a particular rock get out of balance then that rock will move. It has to it's being pushed by the pressure differential in the field of pressure points. It's not hard to imagine these changes in pressure points propagating through the field of pressure points with the imbalance sweeping through pile that was previously in equilibrium. And the whole pile slides downhill until a new equilibrium is established.

Fields in physics can be very hard to visualize Maxwell's 4 equations for electromagnetism may be very beautiful but I can't claim to have to have mastered them. But together they describe the electromagnetic field.

Let's return to that idea of the elements of a field being interinfluential. Rather than some parts being causes and other parts effects everything influences everything else all the time. So in Maxwell's equations you have 4 equations where the values of the variables vary. When any of the variables vary all of the other variables vary as well in just such a way that the 4 equations remain in balance. That is: the variables are interinfluential.

Maxwell's equations are quite amazing in that they are possible to construct at all. More amazing is that that set of equations accurately describes how a significant aspect of reality actually behaves.

I make no pretense that when I talk about the electromagnetic field or even the pressure field on a skree slope I am talking about fundamental reality.

Let's put it this way; Maxwell's equations gave us the epistemological tools we needed to work with electromagnetism as a property of reality. We know how to do the work.

But what is a field?

That's ontology and I don't know.
Why there are fields; why is it that reality works that way?
We talk glibly about things like 'force' but even Einstein wrestled with the idea of 'spooky action at a distance'.

It's an idea we can work with much like Hume could work with cause and effect without yet fully grokking just how it can be. But I think that with fields we have moved a long way towards understanding what causality is and why we don't have to worry about it not having a color or weight.

Causality is just the bald fact that on very many levels nothing happens without effecting everything else.

What do you think?

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.