Choose a topic


.. Society
We Live in the Present

...HUM
10 Views of Landscape
Affect and Effect
Culture is Ordinary
Dataism
I pay rent.
Listening to Corn
The Reform vs Revolution Paradox
What is Public Schooling For?

Art
AI and Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Is this picture real?
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
Weave
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Cognition
Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
Genius
GIGO
I Lost My Knife
Illusion
Incomplete Information and Stories
Instinct
Is free will an illusion?
Metarepresentations
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Pencil and Paper
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Superstition
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?

Economics
A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Markets
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Environmentalism
Blowing Up Pipelines

Epistemology
Absolute Knowledge
Equivalence
Exists
I do not know everything
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
The Past and the Future.
Uncertainty and Unpredictability
Unpredictability
Verificationism

Evolution
Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Networks
Omicron
Politics and Evolution
Roles
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Freedom
Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Laws
Libertarian Coercion

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

Mathematics
As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Memetics
Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Morality
Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?

pending
Police

Philosophy
Agency
Being
Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Ratchets
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

Politics
If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority

Programming
Loopsidaisy

Science
Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Fields
Neurophilosophy
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Time
Too Small to See
UFOs
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

Society
A society needs a government.
Belly of the Beast
Civilization
Corruption
Cultural Appropriation
Family Values
Governance
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
Magic
Open Society and Falsification
Privacy
Rules in a Knife Fight?
Sex and Gender
Society and The State
Spheres of Influence
The Care and Feeding of Free Speech
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Homeless
The Problem with Hedonism
To the Moon
Totalitarianism
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

UBI
Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs







Problems with Universal Basic Income

Better is better

The idea of a universal basic income has been attracting more and more attention lately. It's being advocated by a presidential candidate even. Andrew Yang advocates giving $1000 a month to every citizen regardless of other money they might earn. The UBI is much like the idea of a stipend that I proposed years ago but my proposal was more generous and I thought it would be largely self-financing. Say we set the UBI to $2000 a month and say an employee earned $3000 a month. The employee would get $2000 a month from UBI. The employer would deduct $2000 from the employee's pay and send that to the UBI and cut a cheque for the employee of $1000. So the UBI would be revenue neutral for both employee and employer. If the employee left the job they would still get the UBI and would lose the $1000 from the employer.

This addresses a number of issues. Top of the list is automation which is very quickly making many jobs obsolete. Automation has been with us for a long time now, perhaps since the industrial revolution but is now accelerating at a startling rate. Estimates are that 40% of jobs will be gone in 15 years. These are not just factory jobs. Doctors and lawyers are being affected too. Society has to find an alternative way for people to have an income to live on.

In Canada the poverty rate was almost 10% in 2017. Poverty is not pleasant. I think that in our society poverty is a choice that society makes because it's an essential element of our incentive system. There are lots of jobs that people only take because the experience of not having a job is worse than employment. I've called this 'tormenting the unfortunate' and I consider it to be basically immoral if we don't have to do it. And I admit that most people think that tormenting the unfortunate is just natural because we came from a time when there was often not enough for everyone and there was no way to prevent the unpleantness of (say) starvation if a crop failed. But that's not the case in our society because while automation is removing jobs it is also fabulously productive. I'm thinking that will be a problem because people have to be able to purchase what is made and they can't do that without a good income.

So, the UBI helps in the transition to a time when not everyone works for a living. There will be problems though.

I'll leave aside the problem of people who try to cheat the system since we are already pretty good at dealing with cheaters.

Another problem is that a lot of businesses have low wages as part of their business model. If the minimum wage goes up a lot then so will the price of hamburgers would go up a lot too. And business might drop a lot and lots would go out of business. That might be considered a good thing and not a problem - but it is a thing that would have to be dealt with. Related to that is that it would reduce the ability of people to get rich because there is not as much business. Given the gross economic inequality in our society this might not be bad in the long run but it sure would mean big adjustments in the way society works.

If everyone makes $2000 a month what is to stop landlords (say) from raising the rent so that $2000 in the future would be like $600 now (ie inflation)? There would have to be all kinds of price controls to keep inflation under control. And I've lived through a time of wage and price controls and that was hard to manage and got dropped, so that's an issue we would need to solve.

The point here is that the UBI is the sort of thing that would cause massive adjustments in how the economy works as we adapt to that new situation.

Maybe a harder problem would be one of social control. Right now the necessity of holding a job imposes a lot of discipline on the population. And lots of people enjoy the social structure of a workplace. It is said that the devil finds work for idle hands - and I've seen that to be often true.

In the long run I think the UBI would drive society towards socialism and away from free enterprise. For me this is a feature and not a bug but I know many disagree with me. I don't mean socialism that is communist. Free enterprise makes things for profit and that's not all bad because many good things have flowed from that. But there is no reason why a government couldn't produce things that people need but aren't particularly profitable or profitable enough. But this would be a socialism that was controlled by a democratic society. And democracy seems to be going through a bad patch right now. So a UBI assumes a democratically committed and active citizenry. But heck - we won't get a UBI at all without that anyway. I don't think oligarchs or king Trump would be interested.

What do you think?

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.