Choose a topic


...Cognition
Pencil and Paper

Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
Weave
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Cognition
Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
Genius
GIGO
I Lost My Knife
Illusion
Incomplete Information and Stories
Instinct
Is free will an illusion?
Metarepresentations
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Superstition
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?

Economics
A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Markets
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Environmentalism
Blowing Up Pipelines

Epistemology
Absolute Knowledge
Exists
I do not know everything
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
Uncertainty and Unpredictability
Unpredictability
Verificationism

Evolution
Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Networks
Omicron
Politics and Evolution
Roles
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Freedom
Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Laws
Libertarian Coercion

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

Mathematics
As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Memetics
Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Morality
Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?

pending
Police

Philosophy
Agency
Being
Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Ratchets
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

Politics
If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority

Programming
Loopsidaisy

Science
Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Fields
Neurophilosophy
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Time
Too Small to See
UFOs
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

Society
A society needs a government.
Belly of the Beast
Civilization
Corruption
Cultural Appropriation
Family Values
Governance
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
Magic
Open Society and Falsification
Privacy
Sex and Gender
Society and The State
Spheres of Influence
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Problem with Hedonism
Totalitarianism
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

UBI
Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs







The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts

Very interesting.

The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts

I have a scientific worldview and certainly think that facts are very important. Without facts we would have no information about reality. But we must gather facts so we can know what's happening but the facts themselves don't tell us what's happening. We need to fit the facts into a theory or story somehow. It's the story that tells us what's happening - not the facts alone. This emerges from the way the neocortex processes information. It's arranged as a neural net that extracts meaning from raw data.

This happens in a cascade.
I come to see that there is a cat on a mat. Necessarily that has to start with raw visual data about color in my visual field. That becomes areas of color. Which becomes cat and mat. It we interpret the fact that the cat obscures part of the mat to mean "the cat is on the mat" There are a cluster of words related to stories. Theories, Narratives. Explanations. Hypotheses.

An important distinction needs to be kept clear here; that is the reality/world distinction. Reality presents us with sensory data. The world is what we understand that data to mean. That is, we each experience a world that is different even though we all live in the same reality.

That we each live in a different world creates a situation where we can disagree about the meaning of something. This can be a problem. The problem is that each of us sees a different meaning from the same information. I call this the problem of communicating across belief boundaries. For me it's a key philosophic problem. It is a tough nut.

I've seen that facts are of surprisingly little use at cracking that nut. Facts need to be verified which can be tricky. Most of the facts we handle are verified by others in long chains of authority. There are many authorities and they don't always agree. Sometimes a lot of learning is required to even comprehend a fact. It's really easy to just make up a fact. So what happens is that using facts to try to crack the nut mentioned earlier is that the discussion wanders far afield and never returns to the nut.

We can deal with this. We do it by dealing with ideas rather than facts. If I make a bald statement like "It is bad to torment unlucky people" that needs to be agreed on before we look into the facts about torment or unlucky or bad. That lets us frame the discussion in terms of "If we find a situation where unlucky people are being tormented then that is bad". It brings the idea of unlucky out of abstraction and into a place where we can look at facts and consider "is this a lucky situation or an unlucky one?"

Another aspect of this is that when there is disagreement the disagreement need not be resolved. It is possible for people to live in their own world that is not really in accord with reality. In one way this is like the idea of scientific paradigms - old paradigms don't admit error - they just are unproductive and get ignored and the practitioners fade away. But also - reality can be corrosive to worlds that don't pay attention to it.

A fact isn't a hard thing like a pebble on a beach. It's something we understand that fits into a structure of understanding. Facts are mental things like stories.

What do you think

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.