Choose a topic

The Past and the Future.

AI and Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
I Lost My Knife
Incomplete Information and Stories
Is free will an illusion?
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Pencil and Paper
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?

A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Blowing Up Pipelines

Absolute Knowledge
I do not know everything
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
Uncertainty and Unpredictability

Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Politics and Evolution
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Libertarian Coercion

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?


Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority


Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Too Small to See
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

A society needs a government.
Belly of the Beast
Cultural Appropriation
Family Values
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
Open Society and Falsification
Rules in a Knife Fight?
Sex and Gender
Society and The State
Spheres of Influence
The Care and Feeding of Free Speech
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Homeless
The Problem with Hedonism
To the Moon
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs

Tormenting Unlucky People

It's not right

OK let me be blunt our society torments unlucky people.

Biologically this isn't a huge anomaly lots of social mammals torment conspecifics who have a difference in behavior to death. Even doves that symbol of peace will torment weaker doves to death if they can't flee.

But humans are moral animals and tormenting the unlucky raises moral issues for us.

Of course there are situations where humans torment others without moral qualms.

Our moral sense is not really universal. We favor immediate family over extended family, extended family over village other tribes, etc. So one of the ways that we enable torment of the unlucky is to think of them as an outgroup the poor aren't like me (many think) so they fall outside my moral concerns just like cows or snakes fall outside my moral concerns.

Our moral sense is very sensitive to cheaters we will typically pay a price to punish cheaters. So another way that we enable ourselves to torment the unlucky is to think of them as cheaters. Then they deserve what they get.

But are unlucky people cheaters worthy of torment?

In a society that shelters and protects the right of obscure fish and birds to a particular environment is it reasonable that we torment unlucky people as outsiders?

OK you may be wondering who I'm thinking of as unlucky people. Put simply, I'm thinking of people who are poor in our society people whose income doesn't provide them with enough money to pay for housing or good food.

Lots of people think that the poor are just reaping what they have sewn; that they aren't unlucky, that their misfortune is their own fault, and they need to take responsibility for their own fates and not impose on others.

There are many flaws in that way of thinking.
The primary flaw is that it assumes that there are lots of good paying jobs and the only reason a person doesn't have one is that the person just doesn't want one.

But we live in a time where when a job comes open there are hundreds of applicants for it. We live in a competitive society, a society that prides itself in being competitive, and any competition has one winner and many losers. Wanting to have a job doesn't necessarily mean you will get it.

When there are hundreds of applicants for a job then there will be hundreds of people who don't get what they strive for. Those who lose in the competitions go on to other competitions and those who never can find a job at a certain level lower their sights and try for jobs that aren't as good. So, presumably each person finds his own level.

For lots of people the only level where they can find work is at a minimum wage job.

This is poverty. You work hard and you basically live on bread and water minimum wage living is punitive nobody would do that out of choice.

But there is a level below minimum wage; that's the level where you don't have a job.
At that level the living conditions are worse and you have to deal with constant humiliation. Where I live people without other support get welfare (not the bureaucratic name for it).

People on welfare face constant humiliation, and are forced to a very low standard of living. Welfare will pay slum landlords more in rent than it will pay recipient for living expenses. With welfare you can't even make an appointment to talk to a social worker on the phone you have to go stand in line at the office for half an hour to talk to somebody to make an appointment.

There is a good reason for this. Welfare has to be worse than living on minimum wage as an incentive for people to not give up their minimum wage jobs, and as an incentive for people to get off welfare to take minimum wage jobs.

And minimum wage jobs have to be miserable as an incentive for people in slightly less than minimum wage jobs, etc. My point here is that with our present incentive system the lower levels are supposed to be punitive.

This is what I mean by torment. But nobody at the lower level wants to be there they've basically had bad luck of one sort or another. This is what I mean by tormenting unlucky people.
We have an incentive system that depends on tormenting unlucky people for it to work. Without that torment the lower levels of our economic system just wouldn't work. Sweatshops and fast food restaurants wouldn't be able to find workers.

So why do I call people at the bottom of the economic ladder unlucky?

Well whose fault if it if you aren't very smart so you can't compete? Whose fault is it if you aren't very strong so you can't compete?
Its nobody's fault; its just bad luck.

Those are easy cases, yet we still torment them. I live in a very poverty struck neighborhood. I work as a cashier in the bottle depot. I deal with hundreds of poor people a day and its politically incorrect to say, but a high percentage of the people are ugly. I suspect that one of the significant things that has made them poor is that they are ugly. Isn't being ugly a matter of bad luck?

Yeah yeah I know some people have overcome barriers like those but is it reasonable to think that everyone can?

And anyway why is it a good idea to torment the ones who don't?

Lets look at a harder case. Whose fault is it you are lazy, have been since you were a kid, and no amount of prodding can break you of it? What if laziness is built into you by your genetic structure (and its reasonable to think that this is so)?

Isn't it bad luck to have genes like that?

Lets look at an even harder case: what about drug addicts?

Why isn't it bad luck get addicted to drugs? Lots of people do. Drugs are hard to avoid and while some people can just say no, others live in peer groups that think its cool. Do people really control the peer group they are in? And if thy do, do they really control the impulses that makes one or another peer group attractive? OK at this point people are squirming but what about personal responsibility? Aren't we responsible for our fates? Aren't we free to be anything we want to be?
But the obvious answer to that is nope.

The idea that we are responsible for our fates is an ideological tenet, a thing taken on faith, and not a fact in the world. But but but . . . people will splutter . . . what about Steven Hawking, or Helen Keller, or Rick Hansen (who dealt with a crippling spine injury by rolling around the world in his wheel chair to raise awareness of spinal injury).
I salute and admire such people but I think they are exceptional. They are as lucky as the guy who wins the $40 million lottery.

Their example is no reason to torment those who can't do what they did.

So I say that our incentive system torments the unlucky and lots of people think that our incentive system is the only one possible. But thats silly history shows lots of incentive systems.

What do you think?

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.