Choose a topic

.. Cognition
General Artificial Intelligence
Observing My Experience

.. HUM
A Mind

Culture is Ordinary

AI and Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Excellence is a Plateau
Is this picture real?
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
Gender dysphoria
I Lost My Knife
Incomplete Information and Stories
Intelligence and Motivation
Is free will an illusion?
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Pencil and Paper
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Structures of Understanding
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?
What is going on?

A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Blowing Up Pipelines

Absolute Knowledge
I do not know everything
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
Semiotics and Body Language
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
The Past and the Future.
Uncertainty and Unpredictability
Whatever happened to The Truth?

Body Plans
Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Politics and Evolution
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Libertarian Coercion

10 Views of Landscape
Affect and Effect
I pay rent.
Listening to Corn
The Reform vs Revolution Paradox
What is Public Schooling For?

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?


Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority


Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Too Small to See
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

A Job
A society needs a government.
Babies and Bathwater
Belly of the Beast
Cultural Appropriation
Drag Story Tellers
Family Values
Governance and Power
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
I Distrust the News
Inclusion and Christmas
Its a Free Country
Life Extension
Moral Decline
Open Society and Falsification
Parents, Children, and Community
Rethinking Rights
Rules in a Knife Fight?
Sex and Gender
Should We Go to Mars?
Social vs Individual Responsibility.
Society and The State
Society evolved
Spheres of Influence
The Care and Feeding of Free Speech
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Common Good
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Homeless
The Problem with Hedonism
The Rule of Law.
Thoughts on Justice
To the Moon
Trial by jury
Virtue Signalling
We Live in the Present
What is to be said?
What made freedom a bad word?
Why is there a shortage of nurses?
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs

Incomplete Information and Stories

Makes sense

I'm a bit of a news junkie and am highly aware that the news should not be understood as 'the truth'. A minor philosophic point is that the idea of 'the truth' probably isn't very coherent. A statement can be true or false. A news story is a set of statements strung together to make an impression. Using only true statements you can write stories that leave very different impressions.

Is any of those impressions the truth? Science runs into this problem a lot.
There are many explanations for any set of facts.
But science has ways of moving towards better and better explanations without claiming to be 'the truth' With science what we get is 'the best we know' with the understanding that our knowledge may improve as time goes on.

The news is different.
I read an article about an upcoming ban on shipping Canadian fruit to Europe starting Sept. 1 having to do with something about 'pests'. The article was about the reaction of the fruit industry to the ban but said nothing about what the pests were, why they were a problem, and what might be done about them. The problem with just reporting the ban is that it provides no information about why there is a ban. And that information is crucial to understanding what's going on. And the news regularly leaves that information out.

When we get a change in government policy; say, changes in regulations about endangered species. We need to know why those changes are thought to be a good idea.

Instead we get a bunch of feel good platitudes designed to make the crowd cheer in favor of the change. That's manipulation.
Say the change is a loosening of the regulations. There will be many who say that the change invites environmental catastrophe and that it must be resisted. Again they don't tell why. Instead the say inspiring platitudes designed to make the crowd cheer in favor of them.

Telling why is hard work for both the speaker and the listener. And it assumes quite a large body of shared information too. It also assumes a large degree of shared understanding of that information. I have seen quite often situations where a person and I agree on a lot of the facts of a matter are but disagree what those facts mean.

In the past few years the news has presented many stories of unarmed black men being killed by white police officers. These stories are disturbing in many ways. The situations themselves are disturbing. But the narrative about them as a group is also disturbing.

One thing that is upsetting is that racism is assumed to be involved, and I don't doubt it often is, but is that all that's involved? What about the racist past that resulted in mutual hostility between white police and black citizens? That is a big part of the background of these situations. What is to be done to alleviate that? It requires big changes in attitude on all sides. How do we do that? One of the biggest gaps in information with these stories is a sense of perspective. These stories come up pretty regularly. It seems to me to be every couple of weeks. But that means a couple of dozen cases a year. Not acceptable. But not a huge problem in comparison with other problems.

Two thoughts emerge here for me The news is about what's happening now - not about explaining. We leave explanations to commentators (and there are a lot of those). Commentators give us highly condensed and simplified explanations. There is a limit to the amount of detail you can cover in 1000 words.

Beyond that, there are books and libraries that go into explanations in so much detail that one loses the thread of what was trying to be discovered.

Also, it is pretty obvious that the actual news stories we read are selected from an infinite number of other happenings in the world because they advance a particular meta-narrative. It seems that it's on the level of that meta-narrative that incomplete information makes sense. The 'white cop shoots unarmed black man' trope is being presented again and again to society so that that sort of behavior becomes not acceptable. And I think in the past it was acceptable, but just not newsworthy and we never heard of it unless we were directly involved.

What do you think?

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.