Choose a topic

.. Society
We Live in the Present

10 Views of Landscape
Affect and Effect
Culture is Ordinary
I pay rent.
Listening to Corn
The Reform vs Revolution Paradox
What is Public Schooling For?

AI and Art
Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Is this picture real?
NonFungible Tokens
Public Art
Tearing Down Statues
What is Art?
Working With Reality

Artificial Intelligence and the Collingridge Dilemma.
Bird Brains
Bounded Rationality
Competence Without Comprehension
Consciousness is More Like Fame Than Television
Developmental Processes
Emergence and Cognition
I Lost My Knife
Incomplete Information and Stories
Is free will an illusion?
Natural Law
Necessary Illusions
On Affordances
Pencil and Paper
Post Phenomenology
Reflective Equilibrium
Return of the Law of Forms
Shifting Meanings
Taking Things on Faith
The Hard Problem
The I Love You Gesture
The Imagined Order
The Phenomenology of Swim Bladders.
Thinking about medical procedures
Thinking About Risk
Underdetermination and Redundancy
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
What Does Google Know?

A Country Is Not Like A Company
Alternate ideas lying around waiting for disaster
Blood and Money
Can Capitalism Survive?
Do Our Minds Own Our Bodies?
Everyday Communism
Invisible Hand
Job Creators
Job Destroyers
Money and Value
Money is Different
National Accounts
Necessary Production
Paper Wealth
Post Capitalist Society
Profit Motive Fails
Rentier Capitalism
Social Wealth vs Surplus Value
Spending Money Into Existence
The Metaphysics of Money
The Ontology of Debt
Thinking about Money
Wealth is What Money Buys

Blowing Up Pipelines

Absolute Knowledge
I do not know everything
Rethinking Knowledge
Rethinking Knowledge
The Curious Ineffectiveness of Facts
The Past and the Future.
Uncertainty and Unpredictability

Competition and Cooperation
Dr Malthus would be pleased
Error Correction
Evolution Defended
Evolution is not Religion
Evolution of Cars
Forces of Nature
Is Natural Selection Obsolete?
Politics and Evolution
The Evolution of Purpose.
The Problem with Natural Selection.
The Source of Bad Behavior
Thinking about Tails
Why Does a Leopard Have Spots?

Free Speech in the age of Twitter
Freedom and Badness
Freedom and Morality
Freedom From and Freedom To
Freedom in the Age of Convoys
Libertarian Coercion

Levels of Abstraction
Levels of Abstraction and Minds
What is a newspaper?

As Much As Possible
Zipfs Law

Emotional Plague
Memes: Imitated Behavior.
The Problem with Memes
What is a replicator?

Beyond Rules Based Morality
Freedom and Morality
Moral Realism.
What do we owe animals?


Maps and Territories
Metaphysics Without Absolutes
Philosophy Buds
Sincerely Held Beliefs
Sorites Paradox
Stereoscopic Vision and The Hard Problem
The Gorilla in the Room of Science
The Purpose of Science
What is Going On?

If It Walks Like a Duck
Right Wing Freedom
The Sovereign Citizen
Tyranny of the Majority


Constructed Life
Correlation Wins
Quack Doctors
The Great Shattering
The Material Space
Thinking about Interconnection
Too Small to See
Watching Pigeons
Weirdness in Physics

A society needs a government.
Belly of the Beast
Cultural Appropriation
Family Values
Griefers and Misinformation and Disinformation
Open Society and Falsification
Rules in a Knife Fight?
Sex and Gender
Society and The State
Spheres of Influence
The Care and Feeding of Free Speech
The Collingridge Dilemma
The Dual Meaning of Power
The Homeless
The Problem with Hedonism
To the Moon
Work - Productive, Useful, Worthless, and Bad.

Implications of Very Productive Technology
Modest Proposal
Problems with Universal Basic Income
Tormenting Unlucky People
Why there are oligarchs


The future doesn't exist yet

At first glance, unpredictability should be pretty simple. There is little to be known about an unpredictable system other than it is unpredictable.

We tend to be most interested in predictable systems. Here's an example of a very simple predictable system:
First I define a function that chooses a color according to a number given to it.
function choose_color(number):
if number = 1 then color = red
if color = 2 then color = blue
otherwise color = yellow
return (color)

Then we call it like this:
print (choose_color(1))
which shows red
or print (choose_color(2))
which shows blue
if we go choose_color(3) it shows yellow
if we go choose_color(500) it shows yellow too

We can predict the color returned by a number.
But lets change the function a bit
function choose_color-U(number):
color = choose at random from red, blue or yellow return (color)

Then we call it like this:
print (choose_color-U(1))
which shows an unpredictable color
or print (choose_color_u(2))
which shows an unpredictable color
if we go choose_color_U(3) it shows an unpredictable color
if we go choose_color_U(500) it shows an unpredictable color too

Be still my beating heart :-)

The unpredictable function in this case is constructed to be unpredictable.
But what if the unpredictability isn't constructed?

Science, since Newton and Galileo, has thought of physical reality as a deterministic system: a system of causes having effects that are predictable.
Artillery provides an example. Given a certain charge of powder and weight of projectile the landing point could be determined by calculation from the angle of the barrel and the direction the gun was pointing.
Of course the projectile never hit exactly on the predicted landing point. This was seen to be caused by unseen factors like gusts of wind that couldn't be factored into the calculation. The assumption was that if you could factor in all those unseen factors then the prediction by calculation would be perfect.

The unpredictability was thought to be a limit of calculation. An equation with billions or trillions of terms is thought to be intractable to calculation and so approximations have to be accepted. And the approximations limit the accuracy of the prediction.

An interesting thing about Newtonian gravitation - it's results are perfectly predictable if 2 things are interacting via gravity when they are in free fall. You can readily predict the positions of the things at any time in the past or future from knowing the present state of affairs.
With 3 bodies you can't. And that's unpredictability in a deterministic system. But that didn't really get much attention until modern computers showed that to be more than intractibility. It was that you calculate the state of one thing without knowing the state of the other things - but the state of the other things depends on the state of the one thing. The logic is circular.

About 100 years ago both General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics shook up our view of prediction in a deterministic reality. Both were very strange in terms of our normal perception.
QM has probability at it's core. Given a state of affairs you can only state the probability of an event occurring. But QM is completely deterministic at the level of it's math and is fabulously accurate in terms of agreeing with experimental results. Once long ago, I even did a double slit experiment that demonstrated how photons went through two slits at once and interfered with themselves to produce an interference pattern on a screen. And yup - one slit and you get a line on the screen. And 2 slits you get the pattern.

I accept the view of people who know the math of QM that it's unpredictability is not a matter of an intractable calculation nor is it a matter of hidden forces (as with gusts of wind and the artillary shell).
That it's fundamental to reality.
I have to take their word for it. And in a way the math isn't that hard - I've been able to read the proof of unpredictability and been convinced but can't report the details.

In the 1960s a new kind of unpredictable chaotic system was found. This involved the behavior of quite simple deterministic equations that produced unpredictable results. Chaos theory studies systems like that. (Admits to not knowing where that name came from)

A favorite example is the famous Mandelbrot Set. This is shown on a computer screen as a big image you can zoom in on. The image shows characteristic spiral patterns with areas of color and areas where the pixels all have random colors. You can magnify the image as much as you want. If you magnify a red pixel in a region that is all red then all you see is red - so what you see in that region is predictable if you zoom

If you find a red pixel in the random color area and zoom in on that then what you see shows a new image of spirals with areas of color. You can't predict what you will see until you actually do the zoom. So it's unpredictable. And it's so unpredictable that it's not always unpredictable. But - it's a thing you can learn about. If you zoom a certain amount on a certain location then what you see is always the same - so it's deterministic.

So "unpredictabity" in a deterministic reality turns out to be more interesting than it seemed at first. There is unpredictability that comes from unseen forces like gusts of wind. There is unpredictability that comes from the intractability of the calculation required for the prediction. There is the unpredictability in QM that arise from the fact that it determines probabilities of outcomes if a wave function collapses but not which actual outcome the collapse will produce. And there is the unpredictability found in Newton's 3 Body Problem or in Chaos Theory.

The first two are a result of our limitations as people with limited perceptual and cognitive abilities. The latter two seem to indicate why there is time in reality.
Let me explain :-)
One of the implications of the old deterministic universe idea is that time is a dimension on a par with spatial dimensions. This implies a spacetime that is a 4d space. That spacetime was thought to be unchanging as a whole. All that changed was a position within the spacetime. In that view you could travel forward or back in time like you can go this way or that in space.

I play with the idea that chaos theory and QM show that that 4d spacetime does not exist. What exists is physical reality that changes in a deterministic way.
Reality is a big space and physical influence can't move faster than light speed.
Time is a measure of how things change in space.
I think things do change in space due to influences from other things that are never still. But the unpredictability of the future isn't just a cognitive limitation of people.
Its that the future does not actually exist.

What do you think?

Star I present regular philosophy discussions in a virtual reality called Second Life. I set a topic and people come as avatars and sit around a virtual table to discuss it. Each week I write a short essay to set the topic. I show a selection of them here.

I've been thinking and reading about philosophy for a long time but I'm mostly self taught. That is I've had the good fortune to read what interests me rather than follow a course of study. That has it's limits of course but advantages. It doesn't cost as much and is fun too.

My interests are things like evolution and cognition and social issues and economics and science in general.